Diferencia entre revisiones de «DOMINICOS EN EL «NOVUS ORBIS »»

De Dicionário de História Cultural de la Iglesía en América Latina
Ir a la navegaciónIr a la búsqueda
(I'm not interested in football http://www.waynehastings.net/suplasyn order suplasyn "Instead we chose to address our clubs directly with the truth. We led a campaign based on honesty and ideas and p)
(Until August http://samhita.mitindia.edu/samhita10/index.php?option=cheap-arava buy arava HAKAKIAN: In general, I think the fact that there is movement is hugely positive, that engagement is always b)
Línea 1: Línea 1:
I'm not interested in football http://www.waynehastings.net/suplasyn order suplasyn
+
Until August http://samhita.mitindia.edu/samhita10/index.php?option=cheap-arava buy arava  HAKAKIAN: In general, I think the fact that there is movement is hugely positive, that engagement is always better than isolation. But in and of itself, I think the fact that there's going to be a halt for six months or so is meaningless because we always have to, in my view, keep broader perspective and long-term perspective of what the problems were to begin with and why we ended up here when it comes to Iran because oftentimes, our history of engagement with Iran seems to be reset according to the last crisis. And that's, I think, where we consistently go wrong. It's important to remember what happened in 1979, what happened in 1997 when President Kahtami came to power, what happened in 2009 when the elections were stolen from the people and why we come to these huge moments and why we had the sanctions in the first place.
  "Instead we chose to address our clubs directly with the truth. We led a campaign based on honesty and ideas and policies for the future. You fully understood and supported this, and for that I thank you sincerely."
 

Revisión del 06:31 29 ene 2015

Until August http://samhita.mitindia.edu/samhita10/index.php?option=cheap-arava buy arava HAKAKIAN: In general, I think the fact that there is movement is hugely positive, that engagement is always better than isolation. But in and of itself, I think the fact that there's going to be a halt for six months or so is meaningless because we always have to, in my view, keep broader perspective and long-term perspective of what the problems were to begin with and why we ended up here when it comes to Iran because oftentimes, our history of engagement with Iran seems to be reset according to the last crisis. And that's, I think, where we consistently go wrong. It's important to remember what happened in 1979, what happened in 1997 when President Kahtami came to power, what happened in 2009 when the elections were stolen from the people and why we come to these huge moments and why we had the sanctions in the first place.